From: Pat Newman [Pat.Newman@horahora.school.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, 2 December 2009 5:16 p.m.
To: Gary Punler
Subject: National Standards Fact Sheet - L Flockton
NATIONAL STANDARDS FACT SHEET
To correct constant misinformation from the Minister of Education to the
Public of New Zealand.
|
The Minister’s claims |
The Truth |
|
We need National Standards for all children because
of a “long tail” of underachievement as shown in international surveys.
National Standards will raise achievement. |
Results from international student achievement tests
show that we are in the company of the best in the world. About 10
percent of children struggle to achieve, and most of these children
experience considerable disadvantage in their life circumstances. Most
developed countries have similar percentages, and in those countries their
National Standards have failed to make a difference. Why have National
Standards for every child, every year, when the majority of our children are
doing very well in literacy and numeracy. |
|
Parents are not getting good, clear information
about their children’s achievement and progress. |
You don’t need National Standards and reporting to
remedy this. Surveys suggest that parents are satisfied that they do
get good, clear information. If not, the school itself should deal with
this matter, rather than imposing a system on the whole country. |
|
Parents and schools should be able to compare
achievement with other children and other schools. |
The most important comparison is the amount of
progress made from achievement at one point in time to another, relative to
the individual child’s capabilities. All other comparisons have very little
to do with helping the child’s learning. Comparisons can de-motivate
children and be unfair to schools. |
|
There should be “no excuses” for schools not getting
children to achieve the National Standards. |
The reason why some children will struggle to meet
National Standards is because of life circumstances which are beyond the
control of the school. There should be no excuses for not helping every
child to do their best, and nor should there be excuses for failure to
acknowledge that teachers and schools cannot do it on their own! |
|
National Standards will help teachers to know which
children are struggling, and which children need help. |
New Zealand schools already have and use a variety
of assessment tools and processes that reliably show which children are
struggling. National Standards were never needed for this. |
|
Literacy and Numeracy are what school is all about. |
This early 20th Century attitude is blind
to the kind of vision that is needed for our children who face a very
different world to what it was. Literacy is essential and numeracy is
useful, but so too are other areas of the school curriculum. National
standards do not equate with good teaching of literacy and numeracy. |
|
A lot of schools are not doing and using assessment
effectively. |
The Minister got this idea from a 2007 ERO report
which covers both primary and secondary schools. That same report says over
80 percent of teachers in primary schools were using assessment information
effectively to identify learning needs in literacy. Also, seventy-five
percent did this effectively in mathematics, especially in numeracy.
This clearly disproves the exaggerated claim of the Minister. |
|
During “consultation” there was overwhelming support
from parents for National Standards. NZ School Trustees Association are in favour of her
National Standards. |
The Government made it known before it was elected
that it would introduce National Standards. It is a far stretch to
suggest that everyone who voted for the Government also voted for National
Standards. Of the 3000 parents who chose to respond to Ministry
consultations on National Standards, 38 percent made negative comments, and
only 14% made positive comments. It is unlikely that the small
percentage of parents who like National Standards include many of the parents
of the 10% of children who struggle with learning. It is the President
and some of her executive that support the Minister – not every school board
in New Zealand – and each school board matters more than the NZSTA
Executive’s opinion. |
|
The Minister of Education says she knows how many
toilets in NZ schools, but not how well pupils are achieving in reading,
writing and maths. |
New Zealand has comprehensive, detailed, and
trustworthy information on our children’s achievements. Every year the
National Education Monitoring Project (NEMP) provides the Government with
extensive data. NEMP does not count the number of toilets in schools. |
Did
you know:
Ž
The standards for
reading, writing and arithmetic were made up by Ministry consultants and committees.
They were made up at great speed without any genuine involvement of the
education sector and people who actually know a lot about these things.
Ž
The new National
Curriculum document, which was developed with wide involvement and has wide
support, could be undermined by national standards. The National Standards
books for literacy and numeracy are bigger than the National Curriculum itself!
Ž
The standards were
made up without necessary evidence that they are realistic and suitable for the
different age groups, or for common interpretation among teachers and parents.
Ž
There are to be
different standards for children in regular schools and children who attend
Kura Kaupapa Maori schools.
Ž The Minister has set new rules for Boards of Trustees. They involve a
new time-consuming bureaucratic industry of putting together a lot of data and
reports to send to her Ministry of Education every year so that all sorts of
comparisons can be
made.
LCF 12/09
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4651 (20091201) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com